-What literariness as self-reflexive textuality is saying is that the
real model of knowing is ironic self awareness, how both the rule and
its violation emerge from the same invention of the condition of the
possibility of perception as such: that is, as aesthesis. Both are
neither essences nor absolutes, but the work of differentiation on the
level of metaphorical binaries which allow sense to happen. To teach
textuality is to begin with literariness, with stylistics happening "prior" to systemic concepts of language and textuality. It is to teach the emergence of perception as the self-reflexive imposition of limits of play, of reading as a game, a language game.
-Illustrating writing as self-reflexive textuality using R. Queneau's Exercices de style. Language and
literature are stylistic variations of the materiality of
meaning-emergence via the self-conscious mode of writing and textuality.
A word is already an angle, and there are no neutral, objective words. Each
linguistic choice is already style and ideology. There are no synonyms,
no paraphrase. Each use is translation, modification. Also, there are
no antonyms as such, but perspectives of judgement, a play of discourse
and power assigning slanted meanings, and calling it lexicon or vocabulary,
and not, say, "idiography."
-Twentieth century writing as self conscious manipulation of language as an
arbitrary material construct, as a generalized material creativity which
explores the bases of meaning production. Dadaism to OULIPO to cut ups,
chance, and collage, until Goldsmith and Conceptual writing. Machine
writing understands it better as material code unfolding itself on the
basis of arbitrary parameters.
-Even before the idea of an ''integrated'' approach,
writing, especially after the avant-garde counter traditions, has
already become highly self-conscious of the difficulty of maintaining
the line dividing language per se and literariness. More strongly, that
both domains are actually already the field of thinking and meaning
production in terms of the self-reflexive material play between
rule-making and rule-breaking.
-Textus, we've forgotten its materiality, to give way to an abstract
ideal of textuality. The physical, mediatic affordances, and sociology
of textuality must be recalled, if we are to address more fully the
artistic production of the 21st century, which, like Concrete poetry, is
grounded on material modernism and the expanded kinetic affordances of
New Media information design ecology.
-We live in semiotic spaces and signifying bodies informed by the material
history of media technology. Today, the confluence of the codex--as
memory storage and retrieval device dominant for at least a millennium--with digital media has emphasized the so-called latent
virtuality of the former. The codex carried in itself the virtualization
of space and time, the implied bibliographic material codes which
govern its manipulation, and hence the logical directionality of
reading. The connection between media material technology and paradigms
of reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment